Difference between revisions of "BAPHL 2"
From BAPHL Wiki
(→Five Failures) |
(→Five Problems) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Five Successes == | == Five Successes == | ||
# We made sure BAPHL would not be a one-off event. | # We made sure BAPHL would not be a one-off event. | ||
| + | # 15 of 16 teams finished the meta, including all 4 "normal" teams. This might mean the puzzles were too easy, but I'd rather they be too easy than too hard. | ||
== Five Problems == | == Five Problems == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
# The metapuzzle was not marked as such, which caused unnecessary confusion. | # The metapuzzle was not marked as such, which caused unnecessary confusion. | ||
# Puzzle distribution and answer verification system required more volunteers than we actually had, leading to chaos. | # Puzzle distribution and answer verification system required more volunteers than we actually had, leading to chaos. | ||
| + | # The core writing/planning team included only one resident of the Boston area, which put an unfair burden on that resident. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:46, 4 October 2014
Put on by Just For the Halibut.
Five Successes
- We made sure BAPHL would not be a one-off event.
- 15 of 16 teams finished the meta, including all 4 "normal" teams. This might mean the puzzles were too easy, but I'd rather they be too easy than too hard.
Five Problems
- No external testsolving.
- The metapuzzle was not marked as such, which caused unnecessary confusion.
- Puzzle distribution and answer verification system required more volunteers than we actually had, leading to chaos.
- The core writing/planning team included only one resident of the Boston area, which put an unfair burden on that resident.
